Harris Dives Deep Into a Word Salad, Reveals Why She Should Never Have Power, Then Skewers Her Policy

  

The more she talks, the more Kamala Harris puts her foot in it. 

We reported earlier how she did that chameleon thing again, putting on a Spanish accent when she spoke at the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute’s 47th Annual Leadership Conference in Washington, D.C. 

Advertisement

Does she think that will endear people to her? Doesn’t she get how fake and pandering it sounds, when she does things like that? 

READ MORE: ‘¡Ay, Caramba!’ Harris Unveils a New (Fake) Accent!

But that was only the start of the cringeworthy, troubling comments, and she also managed to skewer one of her own positions.

She went into a full-on word salad about the “children of the community.” 

“I grew up understanding the children of the community are the children of the community, and we should all have a vested interest in ensuring that children can go grow up with the resources that they need to achieve their God-given potential,” Harris said.

Let’s look a little further into what she’s saying here; it’s pretty concerning. This sounds like a recall of Hillary Clinton’s “It takes a village,” but it goes a step further. The children are the community’s, in Kamala’s comrade construct. She leaves out the parents and children’s own freedom in this construct; they belong to the community. So that sounds like the state provides/has purview over them. If she thinks this, she should never be given any power. 

Advertisement

No, children do not belong to the state, nor should the state be providing resources for them (thus controlling them). The state should just be getting out of the way so the parents can provide for themselves and their children. We are not a Communist regime. 

What she would actually do would take away resources from children and families because she would increase taxes by stopping the Trump tax cuts. She would increase corporate taxes, which would then translate to another rise in prices for everything. 

Meanwhile, while she’s being called out for having amorphous plans/policies, she tried to attack former President Donald Trump, which was ridiculous. He has a whole page of policies. She’s flip-flopped all over the place and stolen ideas from him.  

This is so bad. Did she grab a few too many from the drink tray?

She also attacked the idea of mass deportations and asked people to imagine what that would be like. 

She likely got responses she didn’t expect as people detailed all the benefits that would occur, and asked why Kamala was seemingly campaigning for Trump with such a statement. 

Advertisement

Then, also, because she’s Kamala and she’s never consistent about anything, she said something that undercut her own policy about price gouging. 

“Many of you who have and are coming from states where we’ve seen extreme weather conditions in California, wildfires in other parts of the country, or even in the pandemic where people are desperate because of these kinds of emergencies, desperate for support, and then some, you know, corporation, and it’s very few of them that do this, but then jack up prices to make it more difficult for desperate people to just get by,” Harris said. “We need to take that on.”

Wait, “very few of them that do this”? So, how could that result in three years of inflation? She claimed that was what inflation was about. It isn’t, but she just threw herself under the bus with that comment.