Attorney General Merrick Garland’s Department of Justice has formally requested that the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals lift an injunction issued by Judge Aileen Cannon, which temporarily blocks the release of a report by Special Counsel Jack Smith.
Advertisement
The report focuses on investigations involving former President Donald Trump. The primary focus of the investigation – and thus, Smith’s report – is on Trump’s alleged efforts to challenge the 2020 election results. However, another portion of it also deals with the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case, which was tossed by Cannon last year.
Garland has indicated plans to release the first volume of the report, which details election-related matters, to Congress and the public. However, Judge Cannon’s order requires a three-day delay following any decision by the 11th Circuit, a provision the DOJ has criticized as unwarranted. The Justice Department argues that the injunction is unnecessary and impedes its efforts to provide transparency to Congress and the public.
Volume two of the report, which pertains to Trump’s classified documents case, will remain confidential due to ongoing legal proceedings. The DOJ has assured that this portion of the report will only be made available for private review by select congressional leaders. However, concerns over leaks from Democrats in Congress remain an issue, the President-elect’s former co-defendants argued in a Wednesday evening filing.
“The concern about leaks cannot be overlooked; Congress is a political body; its individual members have political aims; and this is a political case,” lawyers for Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira said in the filing.
Advertisement
Judge Cannon, a Trump appointee, has previously faced scrutiny for her rulings in cases involving the former president. Critics point to her decision to dismiss charges related to the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case as an example of perceived leniency. The DOJ’s filing argues that her latest decision lacks a clear legal basis and delays the public’s right to information on significant national issues.
READ MORE:
Is Jack Smith Breaking the Rules? Trump Co-Defendants File Motion to Block Special Counsel Report
BLOCKED: Judge Cannon Enjoins Jack Smith From Releasing ‘Final Report’
The case raises broader questions about the balance between judicial authority and the need for timely disclosure of government findings. The DOJ’s move to overturn the order could expedite the release of key information regarding Trump’s actions following the 2020 election, while maintaining discretion on sensitive matters still under litigation.
This ongoing legal battle underscores the complexities of handling politically charged investigations and the careful navigation required to uphold both transparency and due process.