Former FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried gained an early victory in a case concerning Texas security laws, according to a Feb. 2 Bloomberg report.
Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried gained an early victory in a case concerning Texas securities laws, according to Bloomberg News reported Feb. 2.
The Texas State Securities Board (TSSB) filed allegations against Bankman-Fried last October. At that time, the regulator said that Bankman-Fried had violated state securities law when FTX US provided yield-bearing products to customers in the United States.
Today, Texas judge Sarah Starnes ruled that the state securities regulator does not have jurisdiction over Bankman-Fried, who is not a resident of Texas.
Judge Starnes canceled a hearing scheduled for today that would have seen Bankman-Fried give testimony on the matter. The judge will also allow the TSSB to contest the decision by filing an amended complaint before March 1. Bloomberg said the agency has not indicated whether it will challenge today’s outcome.
Prior to the judge’s ruling, Bankman-Fried’s lawyers criticized the TSSB’s stance, arguing that its allegations only stated that Bankman-Fried controlled FTX’s various entities. Because other members of FTX may have failed to disclose information to customers, Bankman-Fried did not necessarily violate Texas regulations himself.
Joe Rotunda, the Texas Securities Board’s Director of Enforcement, said otherwise. He argued that Bankman-Fried had chosen for his company to sell securities to Texas residents and that he, therefore, “subjected himself to the jurisdiction of Texas’ courts” — an assertion that Judge Starnes apparently disagreed with today.
The TSSB ultimately aimed to provide refunds to affected FTX users by imposing penalties. Had it succeeded, Bankman-Fried may have faced fines up to $20,000 per state law violation and fines up to $250,000 for each Texas resident affected above the age of 65.
The TSSB’s case is separate from the federal government’s ongoing criminal case against Bankman-Fried. Rotunda previously said that his agency’s actions would not interfere with the criminal case. He also said that the TSSB brought its case forward because Bankman-Fried is not personally bankrupt — unlike his company, FTX, which is bankrupt.
Bloomberg noted that other state regulators have largely refrained from taking action due to Bankman-Fried’s criminal case and FTX’s bankruptcy case.
Posted In: FTX, U.S., Crime, Featured, Legal